Using the internet in higher education: overcoming the myths
К содержанию номера журнала: Вестник КАСУ №1 - 2005
Автор: Бэлласт Д.
The Internet can trace its very origin back
to higher education institutions. The initial concept of a computer network was
developed in 1962 by J. C. R. Licklider of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. Mr. Licklider developed a concept he called the Galactic
Network. He envisioned a globally interconnected set of computers through
which everyone could quickly access data and programs from any site. Basically,
the concept was very much like the Internet of today. In 1969 host computers at
the University of California Los Angeles, University of California Santa
Barbara and the University of Utah were connected together to form a network
called the “ARPANET.” This was the beginning of a network which has grown into
the modern Internet. As the Internet has changed and evolved over the years,
universities have continued to lead the way in its evolution and development. For
example, it was largely people at Stanford University that developed the modern Internet communications
protocol known as “TCP/IP.”
Today, practically every higher education
institution in the world is connected to the Internet. This represents enormous
potential for sharing resources and accessing a massive library of information.
Unfortunately, however, this capability is rarely tapped, especially by
universities in developing countries. This can often be traced to some commonly
accepted myths. This article will explore some of the myths and, in doing so; attempt
to unlock some of the missed opportunities.
MYTH #1: Internet educational resources
cannot be utilized at low connection speeds
Many universities in developing countries
assume that they cannot make use of distance education opportunities over the
Internet because of their low connection speeds. The reality, however, is that
many distance education courses being developed today do not include “live”
video or audio, but instead, rely heavily on message boards, chatting and e-mail.
This describes the “blackboard” technology used by many universities. These
kinds of distance education courses only require an ability to send and receive
small files of text. Most of the curriculum is studied “off-line” making use of
textbooks and lectures stored on CD-ROMs. At the same time, these courses
should not be considered “self-study.” Students are able to frequently share
their tasks and their opinions with their teachers and their fellow students. Feedback
is given regularly via e-mail and message boards.
At the Kazakh-American Free University, we
first connected our student computer classes to the Internet in 1999. At this
time, we simply had one dial-up connection multiplexed across an entire
computer laboratory. Nevertheless, we were able to successfully offer a number
of distance education courses hosted by American universities.
Another complaint of slow connection speeds
is that it seems impossible to successfully browse the World Wide Web. It is
true that slow connection speeds make “surfing” difficult, but this does not
mean that many excellent educational resources of the Web cannot be made
available to students. Universities can create their own “home pages” with
links to a number of useful libraries and other educational sites. They can
also turn off the display of graphics and pictures and only show text on their
browsers. This is an excellent option for educational users with slow
connection speeds, since most educational resources are stored as textual
information. This option will often greatly speed up the ability to retrieve
textual information.
Furthermore, universities can download
public information onto their own servers. In this way, this information only
needs to be downloaded once from the Internet. Then, when students desire to
access the information, they can simply access it as an electronic file on
their university’s own local network. This practice can result in a university
eventually having large electronic libraries available to students from their
own servers.
MYTH #2: The Internet is too expensive for
universities in developing countries
Although the Internet can indeed be costly
in developing countries, a more important question remains: What is the cost of
NOT connecting to the Internet? Universities that do not connect to the
Internet lose a number of cost saving abilities as well as revenue generating
opportunities.
For example, once a university is “on-line”
and has its own web-site, many paper-based materials can be made available to students
over the Internet and the university’s local network. This can significantly
reduce the need for paper and copying.
Another
modern reality is growing demand for Internet-based distance education courses.
Today, more and more students want the flexibility of distance education as
part of their education experience. The flexibility of distance education
courses allows students to study at their own pace and according to their own
family and work schedule. This is obviously appealing; especially to students
with busy personal schedules. Thus, a result of distance education has been a
great increase in the number of people interested in higher education. Suddenly,
older students, working students, and students living in remote locations can
all consider getting a higher education.
This fact has been demonstrated by
universities all around the world. One example is the University of Nevada in Las Vegas (UNLV). The Rebel Yell News
at UNLV reported that enrollment in distance education classes has increased
significantly during each year at UNLV since the program has been in existence. The
program, which was instituted at UNLV in 1996, began with a 200-student
enrollment during its first year. During the 2003-2004 school year, the program
enrolled 13,000 students who were taking at least one distance education class,
an increase that has almost doubled in each successive year.
The newspaper went on to say
that this increase in the number of students taking distance education classes at UNLV
matches a rising trend at the national (in the United States) level. National
enrollment for distance education classes increased from 1.3 million in the
1997-1998 school year to 2.9 million in the 2000-2001 school year.
Studies show that at the national level, distance education
courses are more likely to attract older women with families and jobs. Students
taking distance education classes say that the courses make it easier for them
to manage their time between school and other priorities.
I like distance education classes for the convenience, business major Leta Rose, who is enrolled for a three-credit
English distance education class in the Spring, said. I'm an athlete who
is trying to start my own business, while taking 18 credits. Not having to sit
in class twice a week makes just makes things easier.
We can easily see that on-line courses represent significant new sources of revenue for
universities. But, only those universities connected to the Internet and with
the ability to develop on-line courses, will be able to take advantage of this
growing opportunity.
On-line courses represent more than just increased revenue for universities, however. They
also represent an amazing opportunity for cost savings.
As
universities develop their own distance education courses; this greatly reduces
the need for physical facilities. Even if 25% of a university’s student
population is taking courses “on-line,” the cost savings from maintaining 25%
less classroom space can be enormous. And, on-line courses allow a university
to grow without significantly expanding their physical facilities. This is an
unprecedented opportunity for many universities in the developing world.
Another fact
of our times is the potential for the Internet to replace the traditional library.
This obviously has huge cost saving implications for universities working hard
to maintain large numbers of paper-based volumes, magazines and journals. Already,
the information that is available on the Internet rivals that in most
university libraries.
An
announcement made by Google Inc. in December, 2004 underlines this fact even further.
In this announcement, Google, a popular web-based search engine, said that it
is working with the libraries of Harvard, Stanford, the University of Michigan, and the University of Oxford as well as
The New York Public Library to digitally scan books from their collections so
that users worldwide can search them in Google. Even before we started Google,
we dreamedof making the incredible breadth of information that librarians
so lovingly organizesearchable online, said Larry Page, Google
co-founder and president of Products. Today we'repleased to
announcethis program to digitize the collections of these amazing
libraries so that every Google user can search them instantly.” Mary Sue
Coleman, President of the University of Michigan, added, We
believe passionately that such universal access to the world's printed
treasures is mission-critical for today's great public university.” Very soon,
we can see that universities will be better off giving their students access to
the Internet than by spending their money on paper-based library volumes.
A connection
to the Internet does not only save money for a university, but it can also
generate revenue. The simplest example of this is charging students for
Internet use, especially those students who want to use the Internet for
non-academic pursuits. Also, maintaining a good web-site is an excellent
recruitment tool. A university that hosts an informative and colorful web-site
can be guaranteed greater enquiries from student applicants.
In addition, the Internet allows for new
possibilities in sharing resources between universities. As universities pool
their electronic resources, the quality of education can be increased without
significantly increasing the cost. For example, the Kazakh-American Free
University is developing a joint MBA program through a partnership with
Northwest Nazarene University (NNU) in Idaho.
Through this partnership, students at the Kazakh-American Free University have
access to NNU’s MBA library and to a number of distance education courses
offered already at NNU. As a result, students in Kazakhstan have access to
unprecedented resources at a very low cost through the
sharing of resources between our respective universities.
MYTH #3: Distance education on the Internet
lacks useful interaction with teachers and other students
Many opponents to Internet-based distance
education site the fact that distance education lacks significant interaction
and discussion with teachers and other students. However, based on our
experience at the Kazakh-American Free University, the opposite has proven to
be the case.
The Kazakh-American Free University is part
of an alliance that allows us to receive Internet-based distance education
courses from three American universities: Seattle Pacific University, Indiana
Wesleyan University, and LeTeaurneau University. These courses utilize “blackboard”
technology, which relies heavily on message boards, electronic homework
submission and e-mail. While students in a traditional classroom setting can
often choose to not participate during a class, non-participation is not an
option in these distance education courses. In each course students must weekly
post their ideas and opinions to a message board read personally by their
teacher. Then, the students receive comments directly back from their teacher. Often,
a high percentage of a student’s grade is based on their involvement in
message-board discussions.
At the Kazakh-American Free University,
students enrolled in distance education courses will also work with a local
teaching assistant. This is obviously a person knowledgeable in the subject
being studied. We have found that this arrangement also serves to promote
meaningful interaction. In traditional classes, a great deal of class time is
usually spent with teachers giving lectures. Lectures, although useful, rarely
result in meaningful interaction. However, in distance education courses,
students review the lectures outside of class. Then, they discuss their
questions, insights and problems during class with a teaching assistant. This
has proven to be a very effective way for helping students to work through the
concepts of a particular subject.
Another great advantage of the distance
education courses offered at our university is that students are enrolled in
the courses from all around the world. This has given our students the
opportunity to study a particular subject together with students from Africa,
Europe and the United States. Often, our students are put into groups with
students from around the world to work on various projects. As a result, our
students are able to interact and share ideas with students from different
countries and cultures. In Kazakhstan, students rarely have the opportunity to
study together with students from other countries in their traditional
classrooms. But, now the Internet has made this possibility a very real
reality.
Another excellent example of the Internet
promoting interaction, instead of discouraging it, is our International
Leadership Program. In this program, top students are involved in a leadership
training curriculum which includes extensive work with a leadership mentor. In
most cases, mentors live in a different country and are people in significant
positions of leadership. Under normal circumstances, our students would never
have the opportunity to interact with such people. But, thanks to e-mail, the
Internet, and the genius of this program, our students maintain constant
contact with their mentors, sharing ideas, discussing problems and seeking
solutions.
In our experience, we have also observed
that a connection to the Internet promotes extracurricular learning as well. Thanks
to the global e-mail system and the opportunity for Internet “chatting,” many
of our students at the Kazakh-American Free University maintain contact with
friends, teachers and mentors from around the world. Some students have even
made friends over the Internet, thanks to various “pen-pal” style programs. In
many cases, without even realizing it, our students are growing in their
knowledge of the world and cultures around them.
Today, the Internet is a very real part of
all our lives. Millions of young people in developing countries already use the
Internet at home and in thousands of “Internet Cafes.” Interestingly, many
universities around the world are still trying to decide if the Internet is
really worth it. Soon, students will make the decision for the universities - as
they will only choose to attend universities that actively participate in the
world wide exchange of information we know today as the “Internet.”
SOURCES
1.Google Press Center at http://www.google.com/press
2.The Internet Society at http://www.isoc.org/internet/history
3.Rebel Yell News at http://www.ryunlv.com/news
К содержанию номера журнала: Вестник КАСУ №1 - 2005
|