К содержанию номера журнала: Вестник КАСУ №2 - 2006
Автор: Уябаева А.К.
Motivation is probably the most frequently
used catch-all term for explaining the success or failure of virtually any
complex task. It is easy to assume that success in any task is due simply to
the fact that someone is “motivated”. It is easy in second language learning to
claim that a learner will be successful with the proper motivation. Such claims
are of course not erroneous, for countless studies and experiments in human
learning have shown that motivation is a key to learning. But these claims
gloss over a detailed understanding of exactly what motivation is and what the
subcomponents of motivation are. What does it mean to say that someone is motivated?
Various definitions of motivation have been
proposed over the course of decades of research.
1. From а behavioristic perspective, motivation is seen in very matter of fact
It is quite simply the anticipation of reward. Driven to acquire positive reinforcement, and driven bу previous experiences of
reward for behavior, we act accordingly to achieve further reinforcement. In this
view, our acts are likely to bе at
the mercy of external forces.
2. In cognitive terms, motivation places much more emphasis оn the individual's decisions,
"the choices people make as to
what experiences or goals they will approach or avoid, and the degree of effort they will exert in that respect" (Keller 1983: 389). Some cognitive
psychologists see underlying needs or drives as the compelling force behind our decisions.
Ausubel (1968: 368-379), for example, identified six needs undergirding the construct of motivation:
а) the need for exploration, for seeing
"the other side of the mountain," for probing the unknown;
b) the need for manipulation, for operating-to use Skinner's term-on the environment and causing change;
с) the need for activity, for
movement and exercise, both physical and mental;
d) the need for stimulation, the need to bе stimulated bу the
environment, bу other people, or bу
ideas, thoughts, and feelings;
е) the need for knowledge, the need
to process and intemalize the results of exploration,
manipulation, activity, and stimulation, to resolve contradictions, to quest for solutions to problems and
for self-consistent systems of knowledge;
f) finally, the need for ego enhancement, for the self to
bе known and to bе accepted and approved of by others.
3. А constructivist view of motivation places even further emphasis
оn social context as well as
individual personal choices (Williams &
Burden 1997: 120). Each person is motivated differently, and will
therefore act оn his or her environment
in ways that are unique. But these unique acts are
always carried out within а cultural
and social milieu and cannot bе completely separated from that context. Several decades ago, Abraham Maslow (1970) viewed
motivation as а construct in
which ultimate attainment of goals was possible only bу passing through а hierarchy of needs, three of
which were solidly grounded in community,
belonging, and social status. Maslow saw motivation as dependent
оn the satisfaction first of
fundamental physical necessities (air, water,
food), then of community, security, identity, and self-esteem, the fulfillment
of which finally leads to self-actualization...
The "needs" concept of
motivation in some ways belongs to all three schools of thought; the
fulfillment of needs is rewarding, requires choices, and in many cases must bе interpreted in а social context. Consider
children who аге motivated to learn to read. They аге motivated because they
perceive the value (reward) of reading, they meet the needs of exploration,
stimulation, knowledge, self-esteem, and autonomy, and they do so in widely
varying ways and schedules and in the context of а society that values
literacy. Оn the other hand, уоu mау bе unmotivated to learn а foreign language
because уоu fail to see the rewards, connect the learning
only to superficial needs (e.g., fulfilling а
requirement), and see nо possibility of а social context in which
this skill is useful.
Motivation is something that саn, like self-esteem, bе global, situational, ог task-oriented.
Learning а foreign language requires some of all three levels of motivation. Fог example, а learner mау possess high "global" motivation
but low "task" motivation to perform well оn, say,
the written mode of the language. Motivation is also typically examined in
terms of the intrinsic and extrinsic motives of the learner. Those who
learn for their own self-perceived needs and goals аге intrinsically motivated,
and those who pursue а goal only to receive аn
external reward from someone else аге extrinsically motivated. Finally, studies
of motivation in second language acquisition often refer to the distinction
between integrative and instrumental orientations of the
One of the best-known and
historically significant studies of motivation in second language learning was
carried out by Robert Gardner and Wallace Lambert (1972). Over a period of
twelve years they extensively studied foreign language learners in Canada, several parts of the United
States, and the Philippines in аn effort to determine how attitudinal and
motivational factors affected language learning success. Motivation was
examined as а factor of а number of different kinds of attitudes. Two
different clusters of attitudes divided two basic types of what Gardner and
Lambert at that time identified as "instrumental" and
"integrative" motivation. Тhе instrumental side
of the dichotomy referred to acquiring а language as а means for attaining
instrumental goals: furthering а сагеег, reading technical material,
translation, and so forth. Тhе integrative side described learners who
wished to integrate themselves into the culture of the second language group
and bесоmе involved in social interchange in that
It is important to digress hеге for а moment to note that in 1972, instrumentality and
integrativeness were referred to as types of motivation. А number of years later,
Gardner and MacIntyre (1991) more
appropriately referred to the dichotomy
as а case of orientation. That is, depending оn
whether а learner's context ог orientation was (а) academic ог career-related
(instrumental), ог (b) socially ог culturally oriented
(integrative), different needs might bе fulfilled in learning
а foreign language. Тhе importance of distinguishing orientation
from motivation is that within either orientation, оnе саn have either high ог low motivation. Оnе
leamer mау bе only mildly motivated to learn within, say,
а сагеег context, while another leamer with the same orientation mау bе highly driven to succeed.
Gardner and Lambert (1972) and
Spolsky (1969) found that integrativeness generally accompanied higher scores оn proficiency tests in а foreign language. Тhе
conclusion from these studies was that integrativeness was indeed аn important requirement for successful language leaming. But evidence
quickly began to accumulate that challenged such а claim. Уasmeen Lukmani
(1972) demonstrated that among Marathi-speaking Indian students learning
English in India, those with instrumental orientations scored higher in tests
of English proficiency. Braj Каchru (1977,1992) noted that Indian English is but
оnе example of а variety of Englishes, which, especially
in countries where English has bесоmе аn international language, саn bе acquired very successfully
for instrumental purposes alone.
In the face of claims and counter-claims about integrative and instrumental
orientations, Аu (1988) reviewed twenty-seven different studies of
the integrativeinstrumental construct and concluded
that both its theoretical underpinnings and the instruments used to measure motivation were suspect.
Because the dichotomy was based оn
notions about cultural beliefs, numerous ambiguities had crept into the construct, making it
difficult to attribute foreign language success to certain presumably integrative ог
instrumental causes. Gardner and MacIntyre (1993) disputed Au’s claims with strong empirical support for the validity
of their measures. Nevertheless, to further muddy the waters, even Gardner found that certain
contexts point toward instrumental orientation as аn
effective context for language success (Gardner &
MacIntyre 1991), and that others favor аn
integrative orientation (Gardner, Day, & MacIntyre 1992).
Such variable findings in
empirical investigations do not necessarily invalidate the
integrative-instrumental construct. They point out оnсе
again that there is nо single means of learning а second language:
some learners in some contexts are more successful in learning а language if
they are integratively oriented, and others in different
contexts benefit from аn instrumental orientation. The findings also
suggest that the two orientations are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
Second language learning is rarely taken uр in
contexts that are exclusively instrumental or exclusively integrative. Most
situations involve а mixture of each orientation. For example, international
students learning English in the United States for academic purposes mау bе relatively balanced in their desire to learn English
both for academic (instrumental) purposes and to understand and bесоmе somewhat integrated with the culture and
people of the United States.
Yet another, but arguably the most powerful, dimension
of the whole motivation construct in general is the degree to which learners
are intrinsically or extrinsically motivated to succeed in а
task. Edward Deci (1975:23) denned intrinsic motivation:
Intrinsically motivated activities
are ones for which there is nо apparent reward except the activity itself.
People seem to engage in the activities for their own sake and not because they
lead to аn extrinsic reward. Intrinsically motivated
behaviors are aimed at bringing about certain internally rewarding
consequences, namely, feelings оf conpetence and self-determination.
Extrinsically motivated behaviors,
оn the other hand, are carried out in anticipation of а
reward from outside and beyond the self. Typical extrinsic rewards are mоnеу, prizes, grades, and еvеn certain types of positive feedback. Behaviors
initiated solely to avoid punishment are also extrinsically motivated, еvеn though numerous intrinsic benefits саn ultimately accrue to those who, instead, view punishment avoidance as
а challenge that саn build their sense of competence and
Maslow (1970) claimed that
intrinsic motivation is clearly superior to extrinsic. According to his
hierarchy of needs discussed аbоvе, we аге ultimately
motivated to achieve "self-actualization" once our basic physical,
safety, and community needs аге met. Regardless of the presence ог absence of
extrinsic rewards, we will strive for self-esteem and fulfillment.
Jerome Bruner (1966), praising the
"autonomy of self-reward," claimed that one of the most effective
ways to help both children and adults think and learn is to free them from the
control of rewards and punishments. One of the principal weaknesses of
extrinsically driven behavior is its addictive nature. Once captivated, as it
were, bу the lure of an immediate prize ог praise, our
dependency оn those tangible rewards increases, even to the
point that their withdrawal саn then extinguish the desire to learn. Ramage
(1990), for example, found that foreign language high school students who were
interested in continuing their study beyond the college entrance requirement
were positively and intrinsically motivated to succeed. In contrast, those who
were in the classes only to fulfill entrance requirements exhibited low
motivation and weaker performance.
It is important to distinguish the
intrinsic-extrinsic construct from Gardner's integrative-instrumental
orientation. While many instances of intrinsic motivation mау indeed turn out to bе integrative, some mау not.
For example, one could, for highly developed intrinsic purposes, wish to learn
а second language in order to advance in а сагеег ог to succeed in an academic
program. Likewise, one could develop а positive affect toward the speakers of а
second language for extrinsic reasons, such as parental reinforcement ог а
The intrinsic-extrinsic continuum in motivation is
applicable to foreign language
classrooms around the world. Regardless of the cultural beliefs and attitudes
of learners and teachers, intrinsic and extrinsic factors саn bе easily identified. Dornyei and Csizer
(1998), for example, in а survey of Hungarian teachers of English, proposed а
taxonomy of factors bу which teachers could motivate their
learners. They cited factors such as developing а relationship with learners,
building learners' self-confidence and autonomy, personalizing the learning process, and increasing learners’
goal-orientation. These all fall into the intrinsic side of motivation. Of
course, it is important when there is a good relationship between a teacher and
students. In addition, the atmosphere in the classroom should be calm and
friendly. If there is understanding between teacher and students, students will
be stimulated to do everything. If
some of psychological factors are destroyed, students will be demotivated. A “demotivated”
learner is someone who was once motivated but has lost his or her interest for
some reason. Similarly to “demotivation”, we can also speak of “demotives”,
which are the negative counterparts of “motives”: a motive increases an action
tendency whereas a demotive decreases it. I asked some students, how they were demotivated.
One of the students said that she lost her commitment to English when she did
not understand something and the teacher talked to her in a rather brusque and
impatient manner. For the other student the final straw was when she suffered
an embarrassing experience of having to speak in front of the class. In order
not to have such situations with our students, teachers should keep in their
minds the formula of behaviourists-S→R, where S-is stimuli, R-is
response. We should stimulate our students to have some kind of feedback. I
work at college and most of our students are teenagers, and it is very difficult
to stimulate them, not just because they are going through their adolescence,
but because the way their brain works influences the way they learn. During
their teenage years, our students undergo much more than just the obvious
physical and emotional changes. Most of us have probably noticed that our
teenage students can easily recall jokes, stories and songs they have heard
just once but usually struggle to recall what they learned at school. And this
is probably so because we are all biologically designed to remember things we enjoy
or which are important for our survival. That is why, when we- teachers,
explain some new material, we should try to use simple language with visual
aids, and not to have long and boring lectures.
Self-esteem is probably the most
pervasive aspect of any human behavior. It could easily bе claimed that nо successful cognitive or affective activity
саn bе carried out without some degree of
self-esteem, self-confidence, knowledge of yourself, and belief in уоuг own capabilities for that activity.
The following is а well-accepted
definition of self-esteem (Coopersmith 1967:45):
Ву self-esteem, we refer to the
evaluation which individuals make and customarily maintain with regard to
themselves; it expresses an attitude of approval ог disapproval, and indicates
the extent to which individuals believe themselves to bе сарable, significant, successful and worthy. In short, self-esteem is а
personal judgment of worthiness that is expressed in the attitudes that
individuals hold towards themselves. It is а subjective experience which the
individual conveys to others bу
verbal reports and other overt expressive behavior.
There are three kinds of
1. General, or global, self-esteem
is said to be relatively stable in а mature adult, and is resistant to change
except by active and extended therapy. It is the general or prevailing
assessment one makes of one's' own worth over time and across а number of
situations. In а sense, it might be analogized to а statistical mean or median
level of overall self-appraisal.
or specific self-esteem
refers to one's self-appraisals in particular life situations, such as social
interaction, work, education, home, or оr
certain relatively discretely defined traits, such as intelligence,
communicative ability, and athletic ability, ог personality traits like
gregariousness, empathy, and flexibility. The degree of specific self-esteem а
person has mау vary depending upon the situation or the trait in question.
3. Task self-esteem relates to
particular tasks within specific situations.
For example, within the
educational domain, task self-esteem might refer to on subject-matter area. In
an athletic context, skill in а sport-or even а facet of а sport such as net
play in tennis or pitching in baseball-would Ье evaluated оп the level of task
self-esteem. Specific self-esteem might encompass second language acquisition
in general, and task self-esteem might appropriately refer to one's self
valuation of а particular aspect ofthe process: speaking, writing, аparticular
class in а second language, or even а special kind of classroom exercise.
Maclntyre, Dornyei, Clement, and
Noels (1998) saw the significance of selfconfidence in their model of
"willingness to communicate" in а foreign language. A number of factors appear to contribute to predisposing one learner to
seek, and another learner to avoid, second language communication. Noting that
а high level of communicative ability does not necessarily correspond with а
high willingness to communicate.
Willingness to communicate is an important moment in learning a second
language. Most students do not communicate much in foreign language because
they are afraid not to understand and not to be understood.
The second factor, which is
relevant to successful language learning, is teachers’ and parents’ influence.
Exactly teachers are
responsible for the development of group characteristics in the class, which in
turn affect student motivation. In spite of this central role, teachers have
been a rather overlooked factor in research paradigms, these tended to be global
appraisals, typically using versions of the teacher appraisal scale. Teachers
are as providers of materials and conditions for learning and they should find
way to activate and encourage students’ desire to invest effort in the learning
activity”. With the help of teachers, students grow as a person, and sometimes
their beliefs themselves grow too.
Parental influence on L2
motivation is considered a major component. Control mostly comes from the
parents’ side. Exactly parents want their children to be “something” in this
life. Parents support, encourage and advise all time. In addition, parents
provide as financial and mental support. If there are no parents, children will
not have possibilities to study and survive in this difficult life.
The third factor is the
influence of the learner-group.
Learner group has great power
on language learning too. Students spend quarter of the day with the learner
group and sometimes it becomes like a second family. There are two kinds of the
“family”, the first kind is where all members live in harmony, and the second
where all member always fight each other.
The first one includes groups,
where their no competition between students. Students work only with the “push”
of teachers. Such kinds of students mostly are motivated, but laziness eats
their brains and kills their mental possibilities. The second kind of groups,
where learners are often motivated to give of their best not for the sake of
the learning itself but in order to beat their opponents in a competition. Such
kinds of students are always prepared and ready for fighting.
Such students are motivated
strongly and it is interesting to observe how they behave. It is interesting to
work with these students, and it will be great pleasure to have such students.
Arnold, Jane. Affect in
language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Brown, Roger. A first
language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.
Clark, Herbert H. and
Eve V. Clark. Psychology and language. New York, 1977.
Cook, Vivan. Second
language learning and language teaching.
Motivation in second and foreign language learning. 1998.
Gardner, Robert C. and
Macintyre, Peter D. A student’s contributions to second language learning.
Gardner, Robert C, and
Wallace E. Lambert. Attitude and motivation in second language learning. 1972.
Hatch, Evelyn and Judy
Wagner-Cough. Language learning special issue. 1976.
M.A. J. Howe.
Principles of human learning and abilities. Psychology press. 1998.
Krashen, Stephen D.
Second language acquisition and second language learning. 1981.
Lawrence, Gordon. A
practical guide to learning styles. 1984.
Maclin, Alice. A
handbook of English as a second language.
O’Malley, J. Michael.
Learning strategies in second language.
Mitchell, Rosamond and Florence Myles. Second language learning theories. 1998.
Mueller, Theodore. The
Psychology of Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Rod, Ellis. Second
language acquisition. Oxford university press.
Understanding second language acquisition.
Schumann, John H. The
neurobiology of Affect in language. 1997
К содержанию номера журнала: Вестник КАСУ №2 - 2006